By using our detector, you agree to our Terms.
Astra AI Detector shows probability, not proof — no AI checker is 100% accurate.
Comparison
For writers and editors who want a no-cost, private check.
By using our detector, you agree to our Terms.
Astra AI Detector shows probability, not proof — no AI checker is 100% accurate.
A serious commercial platform for publishers, agencies and SEO teams — bulk scanning, plagiarism and API included.
Originality.ai targets publishers, agencies and SEO teams, bundling AI detection with a plagiarism checker, a Chrome/Google Docs extension and an API, on paid plans.
In the independent RAID benchmark it ranked among the strongest detectors, including on paraphrased text. If you need bulk scanning, an API or team workflows, it's a serious commercial tool.
Free, private and in-browser — with honest trade-offs where a paid suite still wins.
Astra is free and runs entirely in your browser, so drafts and client copy are never uploaded or stored — a real consideration when checking work under NDA.
It gives an AI score with sentence-level highlights and flags AI-refined (paraphrased or rewritten) text, with no account or subscription.
Trade-offs to be honest about: Astra doesn't include a plagiarism checker, a bulk API or team dashboards — if those are core to your workflow, a paid platform may fit better.
Per-piece and private points to Astra; API, plagiarism bundling and volume point to a paid platform.
Choose Astra when you want a fast, private, no-cost check for individual pieces — verifying a freelancer's draft or your own article before publishing.
Choose a paid platform when you need API access, plagiarism bundling or high-volume scanning.
See the content detector guide for editorial workflows and the accuracy page for how we think about evidence.
Where each tool wins, without the marketing spin.
| Feature | Astra | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free, unlimited | Paid (credit-based) |
| Account / sign-up | None | Required |
| Where your text goes | Stays in your browser, nothing uploaded | Uploaded to its servers |
| Sentence-level highlights | Yes | Yes |
| Extra suite (plagiarism, team, API) | Focused detector, plus separate free tools | Yes, full publisher/SEO suite |
| Best for | Private, free individual checks | Agencies & publishers needing a paid suite |
Both tools give an AI-likelihood score and highlight the passages driving it. They differ most in cost, privacy and scope. Here is the honest split:
Originality.ai is paid — you buy credits (roughly $0.01 per 100 words at the time of writing), after a small one-time trial. Astra is free, with no credits, word caps or subscription.
Originality.ai is a server tool, so your text is uploaded to be analysed. Astra runs entirely in your browser, so drafts and client copy never leave your device — which matters for work under NDA.
Originality.ai needs an account and payment details. Astra needs neither; you paste and go.
Originality.ai bundles a plagiarism checker that matches text against the web. Astra is an AI detector only.
Originality.ai offers an API, team seats and dashboards for scanning at volume. Astra is a single-page tool for one piece at a time.
Originality.ai has Chrome and Google Docs extensions; Astra works on any page you open in a browser, with nothing to install.
Neither is strictly better. Originality.ai is built for agencies scanning at scale and needing plagiarism plus audit trails. Astra is built for a fast, private, no-cost read on an individual piece of writing.
The credit model explained, so you can decide whether you even need to pay.
Originality.ai has no ongoing free plan.
New users get a small credit allotment to trial it, then pay per scan. At the time of writing, credits work out to about $0.01 per 100 words — so a 1,500-word article costs roughly fifteen cents, and a month of heavy scanning adds up. Its pricing changes, so always check the current rates.
That model is efficient if you scan constantly, or need plagiarism matching and API access bundled in. But many people open Originality.ai for a single question: does this read as AI? For that alone, paying per word is overkill.
A free, browser-based check answers the same question without a credit balance to watch:
If your work is occasional and per-piece, a free alternative covers it comfortably. If you scan hundreds of URLs a week, or need plagiarism reports and shared dashboards, paid credits earn their keep. Match the tool to your volume, not to the marketing.
Move a single-piece check across in about a minute — no export, migration or account to close.
Moving a single-piece check across takes about a minute — there is no export, migration or account to close:
in any browser. Nothing installs, and nothing uploads to a server.
you would have dropped into Originality.ai. Aim for at least 40 words so the signals are stable; very short snippets are unreliable in any detector.
and read the overall AI-likelihood score alongside the human-versus-AI bar.
to see which lines look machine-written, and note anything marked AI-refined — paraphrased or lightly rewritten text.
A score is not proof of authorship; weigh it with context, and when it matters, talk to the writer.
Two capabilities stay with a paid tool for now: plagiarism matching against the web, and bulk or API scanning across many pages. A practical setup is to use a free in-browser check for day-to-day, private, per-piece reads, and keep a paid plan only if plagiarism or high-volume automation is genuinely part of your job. Some writers find that once their paid credits are only doing plagiarism, a dedicated plagiarism tool works out cheaper than an all-in-one.
Free plans, pricing, privacy and how the two tools work together.
No. It gives new users a small one-time credit trial, then charges per scan; there is no ongoing free tier. Astra, by contrast, is free to use in your browser with no credits or account.
Pricing is credit-based — roughly one cent per 100 words at the time of writing, so a 1,500-word post is about fifteen cents. Check its current rates, and remember a free browser tool costs nothing per scan.
The usual reasons are cost (it is paid and credit-metered) and privacy (text is uploaded to its servers). A free, in-browser tool addresses both directly, without an account or a credit balance to manage.
Yes — they are complementary. Many people use a free in-browser check for quick, private, per-piece reads and keep a paid tool only for plagiarism matching or bulk API scanning.
Yes — Astra is a free AI detector that runs in your browser with no account or word limit.
Not yet — Astra is a browser tool. If a bulk API is essential to your workflow, a paid platform may fit better for now.
No — Astra is an AI detector only. See AI detector vs plagiarism checker.
Yes for fast, private per-piece checks — see the content detector guide. For high-volume scanning, a paid API-based tool may suit better.
It's a server-side tool, so content is uploaded for analysis — check its current policy. Astra never uploads your text.
Independent benchmarks rate Originality.ai strongly; every tool varies by test. See our accuracy page — we don't claim to be the most accurate.